|
|
Post by NoPepperGames on Jan 21, 2012 15:23:51 GMT -5
The forum is kind of annoying with how short poll options have to be. Anyway..."3 yrs inclusive" means a contract that will count any partial seasons against the 3 year total. "Non-inclusive" means any partial season does not count against the 3 year total. If one of the inclusive options wins, we will then define a partial season.
|
|
|
|
Post by arch on Jan 21, 2012 16:07:47 GMT -5
Actaully reset makes more sense now that I think about it or in few years we'll be passing around a ton of 15+ rounders.
Would like non-inclusive then, so it's 3 full years after a trade and still alot of value to trade
|
|
|
|
Post by chanwise on Jan 22, 2012 11:10:28 GMT -5
i don't really agree with the clock resetting because it will cause players to never hit the pool. That would mean that you can just keep trading back and forth with the contract just starting over again and again.
|
|
|
|
Post by arch on Jan 22, 2012 17:25:17 GMT -5
Ahh I understood it wrong. I thought reset ment the player goes back to the pool after 3 years, as in his value resets. So yeah I'm for the "once contract runs out the player goes back to the pool"
|
|
|
|
Post by NoPepperGames on Jan 22, 2012 21:54:46 GMT -5
Looks like John's original intention will stick. No rule change. Done.
I'm actually glad the league voted this way because one of the things I really like about the league is the built-in fluidity. We'll never see teams with 3+ 1st rounders like you see on RW from time to time. Personally, I don't understand how those leagues are any fun anymore. With our format, the league should be able to remain fresh long term.
|
|
